Background
This project was developed as a graduate-level capstone to explore transportation-related noise exposure across Kentucky and to demonstrate how interactive web mapping can support environmental analysis and public understanding.
What this Map Shows
This map visualizes transportation-related noise exposure across Kentucky using national noise data, traffic counts, and distance-based screening estimates. It is designed to help users understand how noise varies across space and how far it may extend from major sources.
Why Noise Matters
Environmental noise is more than a nuisance. It is a widespread public health concern. Research shows long-term exposure can contribute to:
- Sleep disruption.
- Stress and reduced quality of life.
- Cardiovascular disease and stroke.
Despite this, noise is often under-recognized because it is invisible and experienced as a constant background condition rather than a single event.
| Outdoor Sound Levels | Sound Level (dBA) |
Indoor Sound Levels |
|---|---|---|
| 110 | Rock Band at 5 m (16 feet) | |
| Jet Over–Flight at 300 m (1,000 feet) | 105 | |
| 100 | Inside New York Subway Train | |
| Gas Lawn Mower at 1 m (3 feet) | 95 | |
| 90 | Food Blender at 1 m (3 feet) | |
| Diesel Truck at 15 m (50 feet) | 85 | |
| Noisy Urban Area-Daytime | 80 | Garbage Disposal at 1 m (3 feet) |
| 75 | Shouting at 1 m (3 feet) | |
| Gas Lawn Mower at 30 m (100 feet) | 70 | Vacuum Cleaner at 3 m (10 feet) |
| Suburban Commercial Area | 65 | Normal Speech at 1 m (3 feet) |
| 60 | ||
| Quiet Urban Area-Daytime | 55 | Quiet Conversation at 1 m (3 feet) |
| 50 | Dishwasher in Next Room | |
| Quiet Urban Area at Night | 45 | |
| 40 | Empty Theater or Library | |
| Quiet Suburb at Night | 35 | |
| 30 | Quiet Bedroom at Night | |
| Quiet Rural Area at Night | 25 | Empty Concert Hall |
| Rustling Leaves | 20 | |
| 15 | Broadcast and Recording Studios | |
| 10 | ||
| 5 | ||
| Reference Pressure Level | 0 | Threshold of Hearing |
Policy Context
The U.S. once had a coordinated approach to managing environmental noise, but federal oversight declined over time. Today, noise regulation is fragmented across agencies and typically addressed only at the project level (e.g., highway improvement/expansion or airports).
This means:
- No consistent national monitoring system.
- Limited long-term exposure reduction strategies.
- Reliance on reactive mitigation instead of prevention.
Public Health Perspective
Scientific research consistently links chronic noise exposure to measurable health impacts. The EPA recommends keeping long-term exposure below 55 dB, yet many communities exceed this level.
Most current policies focus on short-term or project-based noise levels rather than how people actually experience noise over time.
Economic & Community Impacts
Noise exposure also carries real economic consequences:
- Reduced property values near highways, airports, and industry.
- Lower productivity and learning outcomes in school-aged youth.
- Increased healthcare costs.
- Tax-payer burden on noise mitigation strategies, such as traffic noise barriers.
Even small reductions in noise can lead to billions of dollars in societal benefits.
Environmental Justice
Noise exposure is not evenly distributed. Communities near major infrastructure often experience higher noise levels, meaning:
- Greater health risks.
- Lower property values.
- Increased cumulative environmental burdens.
This makes noise both a public health issue and an equity issue.
How This Map Helps
This map supports exploration of noise exposure by:
- Showing modeled noise levels from national datasets.
- Providing traffic-based context.
- Estimating how noise decreases with distance to identify potentially noise-sensitive features.
- Highlighting sensitive and emitting land uses.
These estimates are intended for screening and educational purposes, not detailed engineering analysis. It can identify areas and features potentially at risk of noise exposure and support early planning and mitigation efforts.
Unlike the BTS noise surface, this map integrates additional contextual data and interactive tools to support exploratory analysis at finer spatial scales.
Limitations
Noise estimates shown are simplified based on combined mapped noise surfaces and generalized distance-decay assumptions. The mapped noise surface in this web map combines air, rail, and highway noise into one surface and is a very broad model. Actual noise conditions vary based on terrain, barriers, weather, local conditions, and more.
Data & Processing Workflow
This map integrates multiple datasets and processing steps to create a unified visualization of transportation noise exposure. All data processing, integration, and visualization design were performed by the author.
Noise Surface
- Source: BTS National Transportation Noise Map
- Converted to vector polygons for interactivity.
- Both raster and polygons tiled and hosted on ArcGIS Online.
Traffic Data
- Source: KYTC Traffic Counts
- Joined with noise polygons using spatial intersection.
- Used for contextual popup information (AADT, trucks).
- Copied and hosted on personal ArcGIS REST service.
Noise-Sensitive & Emitting Sites
- Schools, libraries, airports, and industrial sites
- Retrieved via kygisserver WGS84WM_Services .
- Parks: combined from © OpenStreetMap contributors, kygisserver, Fayette & Jefferson Counties.
Distance-Based Noise Estimates
- Calculated dynamically in JavaScript.
- Based on logarithmic distance-decay assumptions.
- Hard ground: 3.0 dB per doubling of distance.
- Soft ground: 4.5 dB per doubling of distance.
Technology Stack
GIS & Data Processing
- ArcGIS Pro & QGIS (data processing).
- ArcGIS Online (vector tile hosting).
Web Mapping
- MapLibre GL JS.
- Custom style.json for basemap and layers.
- Vector tiles and raster services integration.
Frontend Development
- JavaScript.
- Vite (build system and bundling).
- Tailwind CSS + custom CSS.
Additional Sources
- Brandt, Sebastian, and Wolfgang Maennig. “Road Noise Exposure and Residential Property Prices: Evidence from Hamburg.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 16, no. 1, 2011, pp. 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.07.008.
- Bronzaft, Arline L. “A Voice to End the Government’s Silence on Noise.” Hearing Rehabilitation Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 1, 1998. Noise Awareness Day. https://noiseawareness.org/info-center/government-noise-bronzaft/.
- Center for Environmental Excellence by AASHTO. “Noise Overview.” https://environment.transportation.org/focus-areas/noise/noise-overview.
- Congress. Noise Control Act of 1972. U.S. Government Publishing Office, 15 Nov. 2021. Noise Control Act of 1972.
- Finegold, Lawrence S., Michiko So Finegold, and George C. Maling Jr. “An Overview of U.S. Noise Policy.” Noise Control Engineering Journal, vol. 51, no. 3, May–June 2003, pp. 131–142. https://doi.org/10.3397/1.2839706.
- Hammer, Monica S et al. “Environmental noise pollution in the United States: developing an effective public health response.” Environmental health perspectives vol. 122,2 (2014): 115-9. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307272.
- Kentucky Transportation Cabinet. Noise Analysis and Abatement Policy. Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, August 2022. KYTC August 2022 Revised Noise Abatement Policy.
- Murphy, Enda, and Eoin A. King. Environmental Noise Pollution: Noise Mapping, Public Health, and Policy. 2nd ed., Elsevier, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2019-0-01226-5.
- Swinburn, Tracy K et al. “Valuing Quiet: An Economic Assessment of U.S. Environmental Noise as a Cardiovascular Health Hazard.” American journal of preventive medicine vol. 49,3 (2015): 345-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.016.
- United States Environmental Protection Agency. Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety. 1974.
- Yankoty, Larisa I., et al. “Relationships between Long-term Residential Exposure to Total Environmental Noise and Stroke Incidence.” Noise and Health, vol. 24, no. 113, 2022, pp. 33–39. https://doi.org/10.4103/nah.nah_34_21.